The conventional view of Karma is that of a rigid, ethical, mechanical and almost revengeful law of Nature which brings rewards for good deeds and punishment for evil actions. We are told that the individual who commits evil today will suffer in some future life while the good person is suffering right now because of some evil act done in a past life. This definition seems unconvincing at times because it does not explain the many anomalies seen in real life. In his works, Sri Aurobindo presented a more flexible and panoptic model of Karma. He observed that Nature is not rigid or revengeful but subtle and liberal in her application of law, working through multi-faceted principles to achieve her aims. This article is a distillation of his thoughts. Read more
The Difference Between Living According to the Inner Truth of One’s Being
or the External Ego Personality
-
The Mother draws a clear distinction between the individual who is in
contact with his own deepest inner truth of being, his swadharma, and the
individual ...
4 hours ago